
Other potential benefits of managed futures may include:
During times of market volatility or declining stock and bond markets, managed futures may be an important part of your portfolio. The PFGBEST blended portfolios are customized structured products, which over time are designed to provide investors with exposure to a set of strategies with little correlation to the stock and bond markets. In the event of a major, sustained downturn of the equity or fixed income markets, managed futures may potentially provide some protection for a client´s overall portfolio. Increasingly sophisticated institutional investors such as pension funds, endowments, foundations and family offices are allocating larger portions of their portfolios away from equity and fixed income into alternative investments. Managed futures are a sub–class of alternative investments.
Commodity Trading Advisors are regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and by the National Futures Association (NFA), the congressionally authorized self–regulatory organization of the futures industry. All trading advisors must be registered with the CFTC and those who manage customer accounts must be members of the NFA. Advisors´ Disclosure Documents are required to be submitted to the NFA for review in advance of distribution to prospective investors. On an ongoing basis, the NFA audits Disclosure Documents (particularly performance information), promotional materials, and trading activities. Many CTAs update their performance data on a monthly basis. Violations of CFTC or NFA rules can result in financial penalties, suspension or complete cessation of trading privileges and other penalties.
There are basically three types of charges involved when a managed account is handled by a CTA. An annual management fee usually between 1–2 % of the value of your account is charged for the overseeing of the trading in your account. Normally this fee is charged in monthly, for example a 2% annual fee would result in a 0.1667% monthly charge being applied to the account. Most CTAs also charge a performance incentive fee which typically runs from 15% – 25% of the cumulative net trading profits calculated at the end of each quarter. The net trading profits are the combined total of profits and losses from trading. Other costs associated with a managed futures account include FCM brokerage costs, exchange and regulatory association fees.
CTAs and CPOs (Commodity Pool operators) are required to file Disclosure Documents with the NFA. The basic disclosure requirements are intended to ensure that potential investors will be apprised of material facts regarding managed investments and advisors so that they can make an informed decision about a particular investment or advisory service before committing their funds. The CFTC, in November 1997, delegated to the NFA the authority and responsibility to conduct the reviews of Disclosure Documents of both CTAs and CPOs required to be filed with the commission.
Only upon satisfactory review of the Disclosure Documents and subsequent approval by the NFA, can a CTA or CPO offer his Disclosure Document to the public for consideration. Disclosure Documents provide biographical information on the CTA and generally reviews the trading style and account management philosophy of the CTA, as it applies to that particular program. The Document will also contain a review of the trading program along with a list of all fees, potential conflict of interest issues, and a description of the CTA´s risk management methodology.
Performance records are also reviewed showing the net trading results after costs have been deducted.
Investors should take particular note of the Trading Advisors Performance Record. However, this in itself should not be the sole reason for choosing a specific CTA. As mentioned above, the Disclosure Document spells out an advisors philosophy and trading style. This should be reviewed along with the track record in making your decision. Track records are important and should show performance tables, spanning several years or more. A strong performance over a short period of time may be nothing more than good fortune. However, positive performance over a long period of time, especially in markets that have experienced bull bear and flat trading ranges, speaks volumes about a CTA´s trading abilities.
Track Record Components to take careful note of:
Length of the trading program……………Good fortune or sustainable investing?
Worst peak to valley drawdown…………Could your account be profitable assuming worst entry?
Assets under management ………………Has the manager significant assets under management?
A commission or sales fee charged by the broker at the time of the initial purchase for an investment. The broker who charges front end load fees must get the investor to read and sign a break even analysis
To illustrate, assume a CTA has a minimum nominal amount of $1,000,000, and the margin requirement is $50,000. The investor can either deposit $1,000,000 to fully fund that minimum investment requirement or, alternatively, can invest only a portion of the $1,000,000, as long as that meets the $50,000 margin requirement. Assume that the investor decides to fund the $1,000,000 account with $100,000. This means that the investor is using leverage of 10X — 10 x $100,000 = $1,000,000, the minimum investment. The difference between the nominal value ($1,000,000) and the cash deposited ($100,000) is $900,000. The $900,000 is referred to as notional funding.
Investors are interested in using notional funding because the notionally funded amount (in this case, the $900,000) is not borrowed or deposited—the cash ($100,000) is a good faith deposit for the full value of the account. In other words, the $100,000 trades as if it were $1,000,000, even though the investor only deposited $100,000 and is not paying interest or has not otherwise borrowed the remaining $900,000. If the account is doing well, the investor earns money on the full $1,000,000 — even though he only funded the account with $100,000. If the account is not doing well, however, the investor is responsible for the amount lost, regardless of the cash the investor originally deposited.
For example, assume that the account has a profitable year, and the CTA reports profits of 20% ($1,000,000 x 0.20 = $200,000) for the fully funded account. The account that was only funded with $100,000 also had $200,000 in gains — but the investor´s profit percentage was 200%, because the investor earned $200,000 on a $100,000 investment.
Investors must be aware, however, that this is a double–edged sword. If the account has a drawdown, the investor will suffer a significantly larger percentage decline than the fully funded account. If the example above suffered a 20% drawdown for the fully funded account, the notionally funded account would have a 200% drawdown. In such a situation, the investor would not only have lost his initial $100,000 investment, but an additional $100,000 on top of it. Furthermore, to keep the account open, the investor would have to deposit at least enough cash to cover the margin requirement. In this regard, notional funding significantly increases the volatility of an account. Investors must ensure that they understand how much leverage the CTA is using — and the consequences such leverage might entail.
The total percentage return of an investment over a specified period, calculated by expressing the difference between the investment´s initial price and final price as a percentage of the initial price.
This is the rate of return which, if compounded over the years covered by the performance history, would yield the cumulative gain or loss actually achieved by the trading program during that period.
A percentage figure used when reporting the historical return such as a three, five or ten year average returns for a CTA program.
Each monthly rate of return = ((VAMI at end of month / VAMI at beginning of month) – 1)
Standard deviation = SQRT ((Sum(monthly ROR – average monthly ROR) ^ 2)) / # of months)
The Sharpe ratio is a measure of risk–adjusted performance that indicates the level of excess return per unit of risk. In the calculation of Sharpe ratio, excess return is the return over and above the short–term risk free rate of return and this figure is divided by the risk, which is represented by the annualized volatility or standard deviation.
In summary, the Sharpe ratio is equal to compound annual rate of return minus rate of return on a risk–free investment divided by the annualized monthly standard deviation. The greater the Sharpe ratio, the greater the risk–adjusted return. As calculated on the individual reports, the Sharpe ratio is calculated as follows; (Compound Annual ROR – risk free ROR (calculated from T–bills)) / Annualized Std. Dev. of Mo. ROR or Annualized Std. Dev. of Quarterly ROR.
Depth: Percentage loss from peak to valley. Length: Duration of drawdown in months from peak to valley. Recovery: Number of months from valley to new high. Start Date: Month in which peak occurs. End Date: Month in which valley occurs.
Drawdown = (1 – Valley VAMI / Peak VAMI) (X 100 for %)
Example: Peak VAMI = 2000, Valley VAMI = 1500
Drawdown = 1 – 1500/2000 = .25 or 25%
The average time in a drawdown as measured from the previous peak to a new peak (New high ground). If the program is still in a drawdown, the calculation assumes that the drawdown is over.
A Value Added Monthly Index (VAMI) table, is the industry standard for evaluating the performance of investment managers. It indicates the value a manager has added to an investment via a cumulative index and because it excludes non trading expenses such as tax, it can be used to compare investment managers around the world. The column headed "VAMI" within a table shows how an initial $1000 investment has grown over time.
There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, options and off-exchange foreign currency products.
Past performance is not indicative of future results.






